Working Title:
“Cyborg Bodies: The Body, Technology and Disability
Discourse in Pop Culture”
The special issue of Cultural Studies on Disability,
through or against a methodological framework of genealogy, focuses on “the
ways that specific ‘experiences’ of disability come into being and are
articulated within specific cultures, institutions and practices” (Diedrich
651). In other words, each article in the issue is concerned with how
discourses of disability are enacted and articulated “within specific cultures,
institutions and practices.” Building
off this focus, my aim is to explore the ways the relationship between body and
technology in popular culture has been used to enact and articulate discourses of
disability. What I’m particularly interested in is how these discourses shape
our cultural understandings of disability.
For this reason, I turn to representations of cyborg
bodies in popular culture texts as my media object in focus. In particular, I look
to cyborg bodies in science fiction texts. Margrit Shildrick in “The Disabled
Body, Genealogy and Undecidability” argues that disability signifies
vulnerability, and thus creates a “deep anxiety…at the level of both the
individual psyche and the cultural imaginary” (765). In other words, the self’s
fear of the other within the self creates a deep anxiety of difference that is
played out both individually and in the cultural imaginary. Thus, it is through
these science fiction texts, I argue, that our deep anxieties about disability in
the cultural imaginary, as noted by Margrit Shildrick, are played out.
One such text is a short film called True Skin. The film imagines a future of cyborg-bodied humans,
where technologies have gradually replaced the organic matter of human bodies, thus
creating a dichotomy between cyborg-bodied humans and organic humans, in which organic
human bodies are framed within discourses of disability (and devalued), and
technologically enhanced bodies are framed within a notion of the normal.
Furthermore, technologies are employed in the everyday as
enhancements to social and cultural practices of the body. Technologies, within
a framework of disability, are often deployed as assistive technologies,
functioning to assist or repair bodies marked by difference. With the rapid
development of technologies, bodies marked by difference are subjected to technological
interventions. It is here that a notion of the “normal,” as delineated by disability
scholar Lennard Davis, can allow us to broaden our understandings of disability
discourse.
In addition, I want to use Foucault’s concept of “technologies
of the self,” as outlined below, to explore how technologies are deployed in
the representation of cyborg bodies to articulate notions the self, the “normal,”
and power, as they intersect with discourses of disability.
…technologies of the self, which permit individuals to effect by their own means or with the help of others a certain number of operations on their own bodies and souls, thoughts, conduct, and way of being, so as to transform themselves in order to attain a certain state of happiness, purity, wisdom, perfection, or immortality. (16).
Thus, by using representations of the cyborg body as my media
object, I aim to explore the ways a relationship between body and technology in
popular culture is used to enact and articulate discourses of disability and
how these discourses shape our cultural understandings of disability.
_______________________________________________________
Diedrich, Lisa. "Introduction: Genealogies Of
Disability." Cultural Studies 19.6 (2005): 649-66. Print.
Foucault, Michel. "Technologies of the
Self." Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel
Foucault. Ed. Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman, and Patrick H. Hutton.
Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1988. 16-49. Print.
Shildrick, Margrit. "The Disabled Body,
Genealogy And Undecidability." Cultural Studies 19.6
(2005): 755-70. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment