“…All changed, changed utterly:
A terrible beauty is born….”
-From “Easter 1916” by W.B. Yeats
Yeats may have been
describing his torn emotions over the events of the Easter Rising, but these
infamous lines of the first stanza of “Easter
1916” were once again uttered this morning—voiced this time by Vice
President Joe Biden.
Referring to the poem as an allusion to the changing global
economic relations we are currently facing, Biden took a stand for intellectual
property at today’s 2nd annual Creativity Conference, organized by
the MPAA in partnership with Microsoft and ABC. Given our discussions about the
issue of IP over the past few weeks, I thought it was interesting (a possible
sign of hope?) that the U.S. government is, along with (as Ted Striphas and
Kembrew McLeod put it in the Introduction of “Strategic Improperties”) waging
“a seemingly interminable global ‘war on terror,’” also attempting to “explore
with a renewed vigilance” the issue of increasing protection of intellectual
property in this new digital economy.
The film industry’s battle with piracy has no doubt reached
a breaking point and Biden seems to be more than willing to join Hollywood in
their fight against it. Citing piracy as a “multi-billion dollar issue,” Biden
focuses on the various steps policy makers should take to maintain the creative
culture of our country. He credits films/motion pictures for presenting ‘America’
to the rest of the world, and without the adequate amount of protection, this
country will quickly lose one of its key engines of innovation.
Notions of intellectual property are, as we’ve come to learn
from the readings, another ‘crazy mosaic of an issue’--and at least for me, this is a sign of progress, a small step in the right direction. I am glad to see
that at least some action in taking
place from places of a higher power. Globalization has changed the film
industry as a whole and it will take more officials like Biden speaking out on
behalf of intellectual property to further unite and ‘alliance-build’—to not
just “raise popular awareness about issues relating to [IP]” but to minimize “what’s
at stake and who/what is touched by intellectual property concerns” (Striphas
& McLeod).
No comments:
Post a Comment